The Right Solutions

We fight to get the results you need

Talk to an Attorney Today

SLU MD Graduate Denied Promised Promotion, Dismissed for Reporting Racism at Jefferson Barracks VA

This case bears witness to alleged racism, discrimination, sexual harassment and fraudulent administrative actions that prompted St. Louis University MD graduate, Dr. Jane Doe, to blow the whistle and reveal the full extent of the story. Doe filed a racism/sexual harassment/Veterans Affairs (VA) government fraud complaint with the Missouri U.S. Equal Employment Opportunities Commission (EEOC) in Aug. 2014. Mediation is still ongoing in 2015.

Doe’s career was promising, until Doe ran afoul of Dr. Muhammad Atthar Naeem and Dr. Robert M. Heaney for reporting alleged racism, according to a statement of complaint filed with the EEOC.

In her complaint, Doe reveals she started a psychiatry Fellowship program appointed by St. Louis University School of Medicine to proceed at Jefferson Barracks VA Medical Center, under the supervision of physician Naeem. Dr. Jothika Manapalli was her program director.

Doe allegedly heard Naeem refer to African American veterans seeking psychiatric care as being mostly drug seekers, and further referred to them as “stupid Americans.” She also claims to have been advised by Naeem that African American nurses had very limited intellectual abilities and that Doe would need to make things simple for them to grasp.

Allegedly, Doe further witnessed Naeem give honors grades to rotating foreign-born doctors and medical students from St. Louis University School of Medicine, even if they did not report for work.

Inappropriate sexual remarks were directed at Doe from Naeem, and she was allegedly asked frequently if she would introduce herself as his girlfriend because his wife did not care if he did. Later it was discovered that prior sexual harassment complaints were made against Naeem during his residency under Manapalli at St. Louis University.

Naeem allegedly falsified government medical records indicating he had seen patients he did not see. Doe claims he allegedly said he could do what he pleased and did not have to see his patients since they were in a controlled environment.

Doe was expecting a job promotion within two months and reported all incidents to her program director Manapalli. He did not follow University protocol in addressing the complaints, and instead called Naeem and his best friend to verify Doe’s claims. Later that day, Doe discovered her vehicle had four slashed tires.

Doe allegedly took her grievances to a higher entity at her place of employment, the Graduate Medical Education Director at St. Louis University School of Medicine, Dr. Heaney. She wanted assurances that her promotion would not be affected and that other staff would be protected. Heaney allegedly assured her that the complaints would not affect her promotion and that she would be protected.

Doe was not promoted. She intends to prove that Heaney approached and threatened her with dismissal that subsequently resulted in actual termination and being ostracized from the University.

This story, as told by Doe, is not just about racism and harassment at an inpatient VA psychiatric facility. It is about alleged harassment and racism on a university campus. Nationwide campus riots tell similar stories in graphic demonstrations and confrontations.

Despite evident unrest across the nation in relation to racism on university and college campuses, the issue continues to rear its head when administrative officials aim to keep such matters quiet and allow the practice to continue, either due to inaction or ineffective action.

If mediation efforts are unsuccessful, the EEOC will issue a right to sue notice and Doe’s complaint will promptly be filed in U.S. District Court.

Call us today at 916.486.1712 or visit http://www.lawbarron.com.

Sexual harassment allegations led to resignation of astronomer Geoff Marcy

Apparently, world-renowned astronomer Geoff Marcy has more than just a solid track record for finding exo-planets. He has a documented, but deliberately squelched track record for sexual harassment while working at two universities in California: University of California, Berkeley, and San Francisco State University (SFSU).

And while it appears that university officials knew about his sexual offenses, nothing was done about it until recently. The court of public opinion turned the tide against him and he was forced to resign from his post. Marcy had run afoul of Berkeley’s sexual harassment policies multiple times between 2001 and 2010. He posted a mea culpa message on his website suggesting he did not realize his behavior caused women distress.

Three women from SFSU say he sexually harassed students there, too, by making lewd remarks, touching and massaging students. Marcy was employed at SFSU for 15 years prior to leaving for Berkeley in 1999. According to a former sexual harassment officer, several women tried to register complaints about him. She also verified she had seen emails written by him at that time to the women in question.

Marcy’s open letter stated, in part: “While I do not agree with each complaint that was made, it is clear that my behavior was unwelcomed by some women. I take full responsibility and hold myself completely accountable for my actions and the impact they had. For that and to the women affected, I sincerely apologize.” According to one complainant, Marcy allegedly thought his actions boosted his female student’s self-esteem, even though he was told to stop.

There was a possibility Marcy would retain his job, while his behavior was to be subjected to rigorous control. When faculty, staff and students discovered there was a possibility he would retain his job despite being found to be in violation of Berkeley’s sexual harassment policies, the uproar demanding his resignation began. Berkeley’s attempt to retain a serial sexual harasser was regarded as hypocritical in that it would strictly go against the reason the university had a sexual harassment policy in place. It was regarded as morally, ethically and legally wrong.

Despite the claims by some, including his wife, who said Marcy’s behavior was merely friendly, his actions were wrong. When he was told to stop, he did not. Sexual harassment is sexual harassment, no matter what one chooses to call it.

If you are facing a situation like this at work, make certain to contact an experienced sexual harassment attorney and find out what your options are and how to proceed to file a lawsuit.

Call us today at 916.486.1712 or visit http://www.lawbarron.com.